| Zhao Xincheng,Liang Shuanglu.Study on the Measurement of China‘s Regional Economic Welfare Level and Welfare Growth[J].The Journal of quantitative and technical economics,2020,(7):26-47 |
| 中国区域经济福利的水平测度与增长测度研究 |
| Study on the Measurement of China‘s Regional Economic Welfare Level and Welfare Growth |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 福利水平 福利增长 人均GDP 消费等价 |
| 英文关键词: Welfare Level Welfare Growth GDP Per Capita Consumption Equivalence |
| 基金项目:本文获云南省科技计划应用基础研究计划面上项目“中国经济发展的福利效应测度及比较研究”（2020FB136）、云南大学国家社科基金培育项目“我国宏观经济发展的福利效应研究”（19YNUGSP007）、云南大学一流大学建设发展经济学理论创新高地项目(C176240103)和区域经济合作理论创新高地项目(C176240105)资助。 |
|
| Hits: |
| Download times: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 研究目标：测度我国区域经济福利水平和福利增长，对其影响因素进行分解，进而明确区域福利水平（增长）与人均GDP水平（增长）不一致的原因。研究方法：运用Lucas（1987）提出的“消费等价”福利测算方法，测度我国31个省份的福利水平（2010年）和福利增长（2000~2010年），借鉴发展（增长）核算的思路，定量测度各影响因素对福利水平（增长）的贡献。研究发现：第一，预期寿命、消费水平、闲暇和不平等四个因素会影响区域福利水平和福利增长，前三个因素的水平（增长）与福利水平（增长）正相关，不平等的水平（增长）与福利水平（增长）负相关。第二，我国各区域间的福利水平差异较大，而福利增长的差异较小。第三，经济发达省份的福利水平普遍高于人均GDP水平揭示的，而经济相对落后省份的福利水平普遍低于人均GDP水平揭示的，所有省份的福利增长都不同程度地低于其人均GDP增长。第四，消费率低（降低）是导致福利水平（增长）低于人均GDP水平（增长）的主要原因。研究创新：将影响消费者福利的消费水平、闲暇、不平等和预期寿命等因素纳入福利测度模型，对区域经济福利水平和增长进行了定量测度，并对其影响因素进行比较分析。研究价值：有利于从区域层面缩小经济发展与福利发展的差异，有助于实现区域层面的高质量共享发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Research Objectives: Measure the level of regional economic welfare and welfare growth in China, decompose its influencing factors, and then clarify the reasons for the inconsistency between the level of Regional Welfare (growth) and the level of per capita GDP (growth). Research Methods: Using Lucas (1987) proposed “consumption equivalent” welfare measurement method, this paper measures the welfare level (2010) and welfare growth (2000~2010) of 31 provinces in China. Using the idea of development (growth) accounting for reference, the contribution of various influencing factors to the welfare level (growth) is measured quantitatively. Research Findings: First，Four factors, such as life expectancy, consumption level, leisure and inequality, will affect the regional welfare level and welfare growth. The level (growth) of the first three factors is positively related to the welfare level (growth), while the level (growth) of inequality is negatively related to the welfare level (growth). Second, there are large differences in the welfare level among regions in China, but the difference in the welfare growth is small. Third, The welfare level of the economically developed provinces is generally higher than that revealed by the per capita GDP level, while the welfare level of the economically relatively backward provinces is generally lower than that revealed by the per capita GDP level, The welfare growth of all provinces is lower than the per capita GDP growth in varying degrees. Finally, Low consumption rate (decrease) is the main reason why the welfare level (growth) is lower than the per capita GDP level (growth). Research Innovations: This paper takes consumption, leisure, inequality, life expectancy that affect consumer welfare into a welfare measurement model to quantitatively measure the welfare level and growth of regional economy, and makes a comparative analysis of the influencing factors. Research Value:It is conducive to narrowing the gap between economic development and welfare development at the regional level, and to achieving high-quality and shared development at the regional level. |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
