胡宗彪,周佳.服务业全要素生产率再测度及其国际比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2020,(8):103-122 |
服务业全要素生产率再测度及其国际比较 |
The Remeasurement and International Comparison of TFP in Service Industry |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 服务业 全要素生产率 双边服务贸易 国际比较 |
英文关键词: Service Industry Total Factor Productivity Bilateral Service Trade International Comparison |
基金项目:本文获得国家社会科学基金重大专项课题(18VSJ046)、国家自然科学基金青年项目(71503273)、教育部人文社科青年基金项目(14YJC790046)、中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2722020PY024)的资助 |
|
中文摘要: |
研究目标:准确测度中国服务业全要素生产率,从横向和纵向角度比较中国与全球主要经济体服务业及其分部门的生产率差异及变化趋势。研究方法:采用兼具赫克歇尔-俄林模型和李嘉图模型特征的测度框架,首次使用双边服务贸易数据,测度包括中国在内的主要经济体服务业及其分部门生产率。研究发现:服务业生产率与人均收入显著正相关,且与劳动密集度成正相关关系,但后者只在低收入国家中成立;中国服务业生产率水平与印度接近,但与俄罗斯、巴西等金砖国家以及与法国、德国、英国和日本等发达国家仍存在较大差距;服务业TFP世界排名变化趋势显示,中国的相对优势服务行业为管理咨询服务业和教育业,相对世界水平落后的行业包括运输仓储支持服务业、金融服务业以及行政支助服务业。研究创新:基于双边服务贸易视角,拓展传统全要素生产率的测度框架,解决服务业TFP国际比较研究中的数据限制问题,并首次对中国服务业TFP进行国际比较。研究价值:为一国(或地区)服务业TFP国际比较研究提供新的分析框架,有助于科学掌握中国服务业TFP状况及其在全球主要经济体中的位置,为相关政策制定提供经验支撑。 |
英文摘要: |
Research Objectives: To accurately measure the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of China's service industry, and to compare the productivity differences and changes in the service industry and its subsectors between China and major global economies from a horizontal and vertical perspective. Research Methods: This article adopts a measurement framework that combines the characteristics of Heckscher-Ohlin model and Ricardo model. For the first time, it uses bilateral service trade data to measure the productivity of service industries and their subsectors in major economies including China. Research Findings: TFP in service industry is significantly positively correlated with per capita income and positively correlated with labor intensity, but the latter is only established in low-income countries. The TFP level of China's service industry is close to that of India, but there is still a large gap with the BRICS countries such as Russia and Brazil and developed countries such as France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Japan. The change trend of the world rankings in service industry TFP shows that China's comparative advantage service industries are management consulting services and education. China's backward industries compared to the world include transportation and storage support services, financial services, and administrative support services. Research Innovations: Based on the perspective of bilateral service trade, the research expands the traditional total factor productivity measurement framework, simultaneously solves the problem of data limitation in the international comparative study of service industry TFP, and compares the China's service industry TFP internationally for the first time. Research Value:It provides a new analysis framework for the international comparative study of a country (or region) service industry TFP, and helps to scientifically grasp the status of China's service industry TFP and its position in major global economies, thereby provides the empirical support for related policy-making. |
查看全文 |